Hurricanes will come and go, leaving a swath of devastation. And rebuilding will continue to happen after each one. But Hurricane Katrina’s strength and location utterly devastated the Mississippi and eastern Louisiana coast, and floodwaters did the same to New Orleans proper.
We’ve now spent weeks experiencing news stories about Katrina’s aftermath (and Rita’s), and CNN and Anderson Cooper are to be commended for keeping a lot of attention on this situation. The other cable news channels seem to have moved on to Iraq, to the White House leak, to other storms. All important stories, but the belly of our country needs to be rebuilt. And there are more devastating storms to come, if not this season then in a future one.
And so, along with all the other thinking and reacting we must do in this modern age, we need to think wisely about how to repair the central Gulf coast. We must be rational and logical this time.
As much as I hate to say it, no one can go home again. We should not rebuild the destroyed areas in the way they stood before.
Whenever I drove along the Mississippi coast, I always felt the breath of Katrina. Houses and other buildings built right down on the sandy beaches. Fragile Victorian towns facing seaward, exposed to surge and wind. What amazed me is that a Katrina had not happened yet. Surviving or rebuilding from countless other storms had engendered a false picture: that those towns and structures were designed to survive – or rebuild from – whatever nature brought to them. Many had tremendous confidence in this pseudo-reality.
………………………………………
The one good thing anyone can say about total devastation is that it gives us a chance to do it right next time. History and sentimentality be damned. If we are in a time of global warming, or just entering a 20-30 year cycle of stronger storms, we are not ready for it or them. What we place back on the coast, and all over Florida, should be designed to meet the rigors of these storms.
Why cannot a physicist/engineer/architect/whoever design something like this: a domestic “pod” that hooks up to sewer and electrics much as RV’s do? Livable round balls with a floor, making them a geodesic dome that can be disconnected from utilities, should a hurricane take aim.
My idea is that if they get blown off their foundations, they’re sealed and designed to float or blow around without being destroyed. And then they are collected at the end of the storm and trucked or towed back to their original foundations. And life starts up again. No one would be so stupid as to try to ride out a strong storm in a geodesic ball (would they?). The humans and pets and valuables could retreat to higher ground. But at the end of the day, the “neighborhood” simply gets reassembled. The occasional destroyed pod would be easily replaced.
……………………………………..
I’m starting to hear that there are designers inventing rapid-replacement temporary shelters, but are having difficulty getting them to market. The problem with these is that they are vulnerable to the next storm. I think we need to lift our sights above that line and invent something new that can go back into place when the storm has passed. Whole new industries can spring into being: those to build the pods and furnish them; those to install the pods; those to search for and return the pods after the storm.
A magazine, Pod Beautiful, could be marketed. Pod mini-malls could be established, with concrete walkways among the pods, joining them into a marketplace. Inventors could focus their attention on pod stowage, with sealable closets within the pod, so merchandise or personal affects could also ride out a storm. Locksmiths could invent locks for homeowners and shopkeepers to enter and which would keep others out.
One can go on and on in this fantasy. But this would be far more intelligent that rebuilding, say, Bay St. Louis or Waveland to their former glory. This fantasy would be a more responsible response to the harsh new reality we find ourselves in. And be a far cry also from the nasty trailer parks that are now likely to fill Florida and the Gulf coast, offering neither safety nor aesthetics. The impermanence of the pods would allow us to live lightly on delicate land, to trade up to somewhat bigger ones for bigger families, and to become more egalitarian and less house-proud. And our history would show our resilience and ingenuity, rather than our rigid return to tradition.
.................................................................................................................................................................@
